Summary of the Series Dynamics
In what has been a thrilling series, the Dallas Mavericks have faced significant challenges despite momentary flashes of brilliance. P.J. Washington's two 3-pointers and an eight-point contribution were highlights during a remarkable 22-2 run by the Mavericks. Yet, the need for a broader scoring arsenal beyond Luka Dončić and Kyrie Irving has been glaringly apparent. Conversely, the Boston Celtics have exhibited consistent scoring spread across multiple players throughout the series.
Dallas's Struggles with Boston's Strategy
The Mavericks have found themselves on the back foot against the Celtics' strategic approach. Boston has opted not to double-team Dončić, instead implementing single coverage on both Dončić and Irving. This tactic has effectively neutralized Dallas's role players, who typically thrive on opportunities generated by their superstar ball-handlers. Unfortunately for Dallas, this series has severely exposed those players, leaving them unable to perform at their usual levels.
Boston's Depth vs. Dallas's Reliance on Stars
Boston's bench has been a crucial factor in their advantage over Dallas. The Celtics' roster depth has been head and shoulders above that of the Mavericks. While Boston's role players stay within their strengths due to a balanced team approach, Dallas's supporting cast struggles when their superstars are neutralized. The decline of Tim Hardaway Jr. and the inexperience of Jaden Hardy have further disrupted Dallas's offensive flow. The Mavericks' system does not seem to nurture a consistent scoring rhythm for their role players.
"Washington's 3-pointer with 1:04 remaining in the third quarter was the first any non-Dončić or Irving Maverick had made all night," a telling statistic that underscores the problem. Notably, "four of the top six scorers in the series thus far are Celtics." The Mavericks averaged more than 16 corner 3-point attempts per game, but the Celtics' defensive approach of closing out on these shots has stifled Dallas's scoring efficacy.
Boston's Balanced Approach
The Celtics have successfully combined a roster filled with depth and a well-thought-out scheme. Unlike Dallas, which heavily relies on their stars, Boston's role players thrive because they are asked to do only what aligns with their strengths. This approach has allowed players like Sam Hauser to shine; Hauser has made more 3-pointers in the series (five) than all Mavericks reserves combined (four).
"The Celtics are here because they've successfully devised a roster and scheme in which nobody is asked to do more than they're capable of," observed one analyst. This strategy has proven to be Boston’s competitive edge.
Dallas's Shortcomings
Conversely, the Mavericks are teetering on the brink of losing the series. Their supporting cast can be easily neutralized, which has been a significant drawback. The pressing need for a reliable third shot-creator is evident, but the Mavericks' current roster does not seem capable of fulfilling that role.
The timing may also have worked poorly for Dallas. "It's a year too early for Hardy and a year too late for Hardaway," commented another analyst, indicating a misalignment of player development and peak performance times.
In summary, the Celtics' depth and balanced approach have allowed them to thrive, while Dallas's heavy reliance on their superstars has left them vulnerable. As the series unfolds, it becomes a classic case of a well-rounded team outperforming a star-reliant team. This scenario highlights the effectiveness of Boston's comprehensive roster and strategic planning over Dallas's dependence on a few key players.